Difference between revisions of "Secondary GHG Effects"

From Open Risk Manual
Line 20: Line 20:
 
One-time effects during the establishment phase can also be large for some land-use projects. For example, reforestation and afforestation projects often require the clearing of vegetation to prepare a site for planting. This results in GHG emissions from the machinery used to clear the site, as well as the release of stored carbon from the cleared vegetation and disturbed soils.
 
One-time effects during the establishment phase can also be large for some land-use projects. For example, reforestation and afforestation projects often require the clearing of vegetation to prepare a site for planting. This results in GHG emissions from the machinery used to clear the site, as well as the release of stored carbon from the cleared vegetation and disturbed soils.
  
 +
=== Upstream and Downstream Effects ===
 +
Upstream and downstream effects are identified by considering whether there are any inputs consumed or products/by-products produced by the project activity that will cause a change in GHG emissions unrelated to the primary effect during the project activity’s operating phase.
 +
 +
== Examples ==
 +
* Project activities that use fossil or biomass fuels to generate electricity, heat, or steam. Upstream effects may result from changes in the extraction of fossil fuels, the harvest of biomass, and the transportation of either type of fuel—e.g., changes in the release of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) during coal mining, the release of CO<sub>2</sub> from fuel combustion during harvesting, and the release of CO<sub>2</sub> from transporting coal or biomass
 +
* Project activities that cause a change in the use of materials or products that give rise to GHG emissions as a result of physical or chemical processing during their manufacture, use, or disposal.
 +
* Project activities that cause a change in the use of materials or products whose application gives rise to GHG emissions—e.g., changes in nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions associated with the application of nitrogen fertilizer; changes in HFC leakage from refrigeration equipment, or changes in the use of lime in sulphur dioxide scrubbers in a coal fired boiler.
 +
* Project activities that involve the transportation of materials, employees, products, and waste. Changes in GHG emissions may arise from changes in the combustion of fuels in vehicles, trains, ships, and aircraft.
 +
* Project activities that affect levels of fugitive or vented emissions. For example, a project activity may incidentally cause changes in GHG emissions from leaking joints, seals, packing, and gaskets; CH<sub>4</sub> emissions vented from coal mines; or CH<sub>4</sub> leaks from gas transport and storage.
 +
* Project activities that cause changes in GHG emissions from disposed waste—e.g., changes in CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from landfilled waste, even if these changes occur much later than the implementation of the project activity.
  
 
==Issues and Challenges ==
 
==Issues and Challenges ==

Revision as of 23:10, 1 November 2021

Definition

A Secondary GHG Effect is an unintended change caused by a GHG Project Activity in GHG Emissions, removals, or storage associated with a GHG source or sink. [1]

Project activities often produce changes in GHG emissions aside from their primary effects—and these are termed secondary effects. As with primary effects, these secondary effects are defined as a difference in GHG emissions between the GHG Baseline Scenario and the project activity. The baseline scenario used for estimating the secondary effects is the same as that identified for the related primary effect.

Secondary effects may be “positive” (e.g., involving a reduction in GHG emissions) or “negative” (e.g., involving an increase in GHG emissions). Secondary effects are typically small relative to a project activity’s Primary GHG Effects. In some cases, however, they may undermine or negate the primary effect. Therefore, it is wise to consider the type and magnitude of secondary effects before proceeding with rest of the GHG Project Protocol.

Secondary effects are classified into two categories:

  • One-Time Effects: Changes in GHG emissions associated with the construction, installation, and establishment or the decommissioning and termination of the project activity.
  • Upstream and Downstream Effects: Recurring changes in GHG emissions associated with inputs to the project activity (upstream) or products from the project activity (downstream), relative to baseline emissions.


Some upstream and downstream effects may involve market responses to the changes in supply and/or demand for project activity inputs or products. Only significant secondary effects, however, need to be monitored and quantified under the GHG Project Protocol. Whether a secondary effect is considered significant depends on its magnitude relative to its associated primary effect and on circumstances surrounding the associated project activity.

One-Time Effects

One-time effects are identified by considering whether the project activity will require any practices, processes, or consumption or production of energy or materials during its establishment and termination that will cause a change in GHG emissions unrelated to the primary effect.

For some types of projects, large one-time effects may arise during construction or establishment from the transportation of equipment, or manufacturing and use of cement used in construction. During the decommissioning or termination phase, the one-time effects to consider may be associated with off-site waste disposal and dismantling equipment.

One-time effects during the establishment phase can also be large for some land-use projects. For example, reforestation and afforestation projects often require the clearing of vegetation to prepare a site for planting. This results in GHG emissions from the machinery used to clear the site, as well as the release of stored carbon from the cleared vegetation and disturbed soils.

Upstream and Downstream Effects

Upstream and downstream effects are identified by considering whether there are any inputs consumed or products/by-products produced by the project activity that will cause a change in GHG emissions unrelated to the primary effect during the project activity’s operating phase.

Examples

  • Project activities that use fossil or biomass fuels to generate electricity, heat, or steam. Upstream effects may result from changes in the extraction of fossil fuels, the harvest of biomass, and the transportation of either type of fuel—e.g., changes in the release of methane (CH4) during coal mining, the release of CO2 from fuel combustion during harvesting, and the release of CO2 from transporting coal or biomass
  • Project activities that cause a change in the use of materials or products that give rise to GHG emissions as a result of physical or chemical processing during their manufacture, use, or disposal.
  • Project activities that cause a change in the use of materials or products whose application gives rise to GHG emissions—e.g., changes in nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions associated with the application of nitrogen fertilizer; changes in HFC leakage from refrigeration equipment, or changes in the use of lime in sulphur dioxide scrubbers in a coal fired boiler.
  • Project activities that involve the transportation of materials, employees, products, and waste. Changes in GHG emissions may arise from changes in the combustion of fuels in vehicles, trains, ships, and aircraft.
  • Project activities that affect levels of fugitive or vented emissions. For example, a project activity may incidentally cause changes in GHG emissions from leaking joints, seals, packing, and gaskets; CH4 emissions vented from coal mines; or CH4 leaks from gas transport and storage.
  • Project activities that cause changes in GHG emissions from disposed waste—e.g., changes in CH4 emissions from landfilled waste, even if these changes occur much later than the implementation of the project activity.

Issues and Challenges

References

  1. The GHG Protocol for Project Accounting, 2005