PACTA versus PCAF

From Open Risk Manual
Revision as of 14:36, 15 November 2021 by Wiki admin (talk | contribs)

PACTA versus PCAF

A carbon footprint approach involves estimating the total amount of CO2 emissions associated with a portfolio. As an output, carbon footprinting gives a single-figure indicator (CO2 emission of the portfolio) and an estimate of which sectors are carbon-intensive versus those that are not. While this approach is useful to help a bank to identify the ‘hotpots’ in the portfolio that need action first, the top-down estimates make the approach a means to arrive at an estimated measurement, not a methodology for target-setting or portfolio steering

Absolute Emissions Challenges

Limitations inherent in carbon footprint approaches for credit portfolios that concern the aggregation of absolute emissions (or volumes of emissions) at portfolio level[1]:

  • Aggregating absolute emissions across portfolios is challenging and often time incomplete
  • Allocating absolute emissions to a portfolio introduces volatility, which makes it unfit for steering

Relative Emissions Challenges

See Also

References

  1. Credit Portfolio Alignment, An application of the PACTA methodology by Katowice Banks in partnership with the 2 Degrees Investing Initiative, 2020