Difference between revisions of "PACTA versus PCAF"
From Open Risk Manual
Wiki admin (talk | contribs) |
Wiki admin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [[Paris Agreement Capital Transition Assessment]] | * [[Paris Agreement Capital Transition Assessment]] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:PCAF]] |
| + | [[Category:PACTA]] | ||
[[Category:X versus Y]] | [[Category:X versus Y]] | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 15 November 2021
PACTA versus PCAF
A carbon footprint approach involves estimating the total amount of CO2 emissions associated with a portfolio. As an output, carbon footprinting gives a single-figure indicator (CO2 emission of the portfolio) and an estimate of which sectors are carbon-intensive versus those that are not. While this approach is useful to help a bank to identify the ‘hotpots’ in the portfolio that need action first, the top-down estimates make the approach a means to arrive at an estimated measurement, not a methodology for target-setting or portfolio steering
