Difference between revisions of "EFET CMA versus RECS Agreement"

From Open Risk Manual
Line 16: Line 16:
 
| Objective
 
| Objective
 
| Purchase, Sale, Delivery and Acceptance of Certificates  
 
| Purchase, Sale, Delivery and Acceptance of Certificates  
| Sell and Deliver / Buy and Accept a Quantity of Certificates.
+
| Sell and Deliver / Buy and Accept a Quantity of Certificates.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Number of Certificates
 
| Number of Certificates
 
| Master Agreement
 
| Master Agreement
 
| Agreement For Single or Multiple Deliveries
 
| Agreement For Single or Multiple Deliveries
 +
|-
 +
| Pre-Existing Contracts
 +
| Recognized as Individual Contracts
 +
| N/A
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
[[Category:Energy Accounting]]
 
[[Category:Energy Accounting]]
 
[[Category:X versus Y]]
 
[[Category:X versus Y]]

Revision as of 16:47, 2 June 2023

EFET CMA versus RECS Agreement

A high level comparison of two examples of Energy Attribute Certificate. Based on

  • EECS GO Trade Agreement For Single or Multiple Deliveries version 2.2
  • EFET EECS Certificates Master Agreement Version 1.1(b)


NB: The focus of the comparison is on concepts and data requirements relating in particular to the function of such instruments as Guarantee of Origin rather than legal and more generic financial contract details.

Concept / Data Attribute EFET RCES
Objective Purchase, Sale, Delivery and Acceptance of Certificates Sell and Deliver / Buy and Accept a Quantity of Certificates.
Number of Certificates Master Agreement Agreement For Single or Multiple Deliveries
Pre-Existing Contracts Recognized as Individual Contracts N/A