Search results

From Open Risk Manual
  • ...the elements of the 1988 Accord that were not revised during the Basel II process, the 1996 Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks, and ...apital adequacy and the minimum standard to be achieved which the national supervisory authorities represented on the Committee will propose for adoption in their
    20 KB (3,034 words) - 11:39, 26 March 2021
  • ...nt it. Rather, assessments will be based on the adequacy of the regulatory/supervisory standards adopted by the respective country and the country's performance r ..., supervisors should consider implementing key elements of the supervisory review and market discipline components of the new Framework even if the Basel II
    5 KB (748 words) - 11:39, 26 March 2021
  • ...the elements of the 1988 Accord that were not revised during the Basel II process, the 1996 Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks, and ...apital adequacy and the minimum standard to be achieved which the national supervisory authorities represented on the Committee will propose for adoption in their
    19 KB (2,931 words) - 12:29, 26 March 2021
  • ...the elements of the 1988 Accord that were not revised during the Basel II process, the 1996 Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks, and <td> The Second Pillar - Supervisory Review Process <em>and</em></td>
    3 KB (386 words) - 14:45, 9 April 2021
  • ...implemented by banks that attempt to address these challenges and reviews supervisory concerns relating to the current state of practice.</p> ...under Pillar 2 (supervisory review process) of the Basel II Framework, to review and evaluate banks' internal capital adequacy assessments.</p>
    3 KB (392 words) - 11:43, 26 March 2021
  • ''Supervisory guidance for assessing banks' financial instrument fair value practices''. ...ness of banks' valuation practices through the Pillar 2 supervisory review process under the Basel II Framework.</p>
    3 KB (344 words) - 11:43, 26 March 2021
  • <h3>Enhancements to Pillar 2 (supervisory review process)</h3> ...o strengthen its supervisory guidance and the links to the Pillar 2 review process in the following ways:</p>
    7 KB (993 words) - 11:43, 26 March 2021
  • ...implemented by banks that attempt to address these challenges and reviews supervisory concerns relating to the current state of practice.</p> ...under Pillar 2 (supervisory review process) of the Basel II Framework, to review and evaluate banks' internal capital adequacy assessments.</p>
    3 KB (397 words) - 11:43, 26 March 2021
  • ''Supervisory guidance for assessing banks' financial instrument fair falue practices''. ...ness of banks' valuation practices through the Pillar 2 supervisory review process under the Basel II Framework.</p>
    3 KB (344 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • <p class="Paragraph"><span>The supplemental Pillar 2 (supervisory review process) guidance </span><span>addresses several notable weaknesses that have been
    4 KB (539 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ...e economic growth, as banks are at the centre of the credit intermediation process between savers and investors. Moreover, banks provide critical services to ...ing system. The crisis was further amplified by a procyclical deleveraging process and by the interconnectedness of systemic institutions through an array of
    11 KB (1,648 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ...Measurement Approach]], [[Disclosure Requirements]], [[Supervisory Review Process]], [[Internal Models Approach]], [[Standardised Measurement Method]], [[Mar
    4 KB (631 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ''Peer review of supervisory authorities' implementation of stress testing principles''. ...at stress testing has become a key component of the supervisory assessment process as well as a tool for contingency planning and communication. Countries are
    3 KB (373 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ''Revised good practice principles for supervisory colleges''. ...principles remain fit for purpose and that they describe how high quality supervisory colleges typically function. The key changes include the following:</p>
    4 KB (521 words) - 11:45, 26 March 2021
  • ''Supervisory framework for measuring and controlling large exposures''. <p>This Basel Committee on Banking Supervision standard sets out a supervisory framework for measuring and controlling large exposures. The framework is s
    4 KB (645 words) - 12:04, 26 March 2021
  • ''Supervisory guidelines for identifying and dealing with weak banks''. ...he Basel Committee is publishing for comment the consultative document <em>Supervisory guidelines for identifying and dealing with weak banks</em>. Once final, th
    3 KB (431 words) - 11:45, 26 March 2021
  • ...sists of three pillars: minimum capital requirements, a supervisory review process, and effective use of market discipline. With regard to minimum capital req
    2 KB (322 words) - 11:46, 26 March 2021
  • ...ng with minimum capital requirements (Pillar 1) and the supervisory review process (Pillar 2). In January 2001, the Committee issued a Second Consultative Pac ...g organisation. As in previous years, the survey was conducted by national supervisory authorities that, based on public reports, assessed the extent of disclosur
    6 KB (872 words) - 11:46, 26 March 2021
  • ''Conducting a Supervisory Self-Assessment - Practical Application''. ...veness of supervision. The process is not necessarily a one-time event and supervisory authorities may choose to conduct self-assessments on a periodic basis.</p>
    5 KB (707 words) - 11:46, 26 March 2021
  • ...tomer service innovation. The Committee has therefore preferred to express supervisory expectations and guidance in the form of <em>Risk Management Principles</em ...een expressed by the Committee or by national supervisors in previous bank supervisory guidance. However, some issues, such as the management of outsourcing relat
    10 KB (1,410 words) - 11:47, 26 March 2021

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)