Search results

From Open Risk Manual
  • ...anuary 2001 and September 2003 , and is being issued to support the Pillar 2 approach to interest rate risk in the banking book in the new capital frame
    2 KB (349 words) - 11:39, 26 March 2021
  • ...he new Framework. Sections 3, 4 and 5 discuss implementation of Pillars 1, 2 and 3 more specifically. Sections 6 and 7 address potential changes to the * Keywords: [[Pillar 2]], [[Pillar 1]], [[Pillar 3]]
    5 KB (748 words) - 11:39, 26 March 2021
  • <p align="justify">2. The Committee expects its members to move forward with the appropriate ado ...upplementary measure may be more binding. More generally, under the second pillar, supervisors should expect banks to operate above minimum regulatory capita
    19 KB (2,931 words) - 12:29, 26 March 2021
  • <td>Part 2:</td> <td> The First Pillar - Minimum Capital Requirements</td>
    3 KB (386 words) - 14:45, 9 April 2021
  • ...The paper is also addressed to supervisors, who are required under Pillar 2 (supervisory review process) of the Basel II Framework, to review and evalu
    3 KB (392 words) - 11:43, 26 March 2021
  • ...sors assess the soundness of banks' valuation practices through the Pillar 2 supervisory review process under the Basel II Framework.</p>
    3 KB (344 words) - 11:43, 26 March 2021
  • <h3>Enhancements to Pillar 1 (minimum capital requirements)</h3> ...other trading book proposals noted above, the Committee is proposing other Pillar 1 enhancements that focus on strengthening the risk capture of the framewor
    7 KB (993 words) - 11:43, 26 March 2021
  • ...The paper is also addressed to supervisors, who are required under Pillar 2 (supervisory review process) of the Basel II Framework, to review and evalu
    3 KB (397 words) - 11:43, 26 March 2021
  • ...sors assess the soundness of banks' valuation practices through the Pillar 2 supervisory review process under the Basel II Framework.</p>
    3 KB (344 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ...he Committee is strengthening the treatment for certain securitisations in Pillar 1 (minimum capital requirements). It is introducing higher risk weights for <p class="Paragraph"><span>The supplemental Pillar 2 (supervisory review process) guidance </span><span>addresses several notabl
    4 KB (539 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ...under the current Basel Committee standard, banks could hold as little as 2% common equity to risk-based assets, before the application of key regulato ...measure to the Basel II risk-based framework with a view to migrating to a Pillar 1 treatment based on appropriate review and calibration. This will help con
    11 KB (1,648 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ...uld be carried out in the first half of 2017 with a view to migrating to a Pillar 1 treatment on 1 January 2018 based on appropriate review and calibration. ...illion, are well diversified and are internationally active) and 169 Group 2 banks (ie all other banks).</p>
    9 KB (1,436 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ...uld be carried out in the first half of 2017 with a view to migrating to a Pillar 1 treatment on 1 January 2018 based on appropriate review and calibration. ...illion, are well diversified and are internationally active) and 169 Group 2 banks (ie all other banks).</p>
    9 KB (1,415 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • ...uld be carried out in the first half of 2017 with a view to migrating to a Pillar 1 treatment on 1 January 2018 based on appropriate review and calibration. ...illion, are well diversified and are internationally active) and 169 Group 2 banks (ie all other banks).</p>
    9 KB (1,428 words) - 11:44, 26 March 2021
  • * Keywords: [[Risk Capture]], [[Pillar 2]], [[Pillar II]], [[Governance]], [[Capital Policy]], [[Stress Testing]], [[ICCAP]]
    3 KB (464 words) - 11:45, 26 March 2021
  • ...capital requirements (Pillar 1) and the supervisory review process (Pillar 2). In January 2001, the Committee issued a Second Consultative Package on th ...e practices generally coincide with those identified in the proposed third pillar of the New Basel Capital Accord. To achieve this the survey was streamlined
    6 KB (872 words) - 11:46, 26 March 2021
  • ...sclosure of interest rate risk in the banking book based upon the proposed Pillar 1 approach, which would better accommodate differing market conditions and
    3 KB (437 words) - 11:47, 26 March 2021
  • ...k for systemically important banks (SIBs), the leverage ratio, the revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements and the large exposure framework.</p> ..., [[Compliance]], [[Regulatory Consistency Assessment Programme]], [[Level 2 Assessments]]
    2 KB (347 words) - 11:47, 26 March 2021
  • ...the standards for global and domestic systemically important banks (SIBs), Pillar 3 disclosure requirements and the large exposure framework.</p> ..., [[Compliance]], [[Regulatory Consistency Assessment Programme]], [[Level 2 Assessments]]
    2 KB (345 words) - 11:48, 26 March 2021
  • ...the standards for global and domestic systemically important banks (SIBs), Pillar 3 disclosure requirements, and the large exposure framework.</p> ..., [[Compliance]], [[Regulatory Consistency Assessment Programme]], [[Level 2 Assessments]]
    2 KB (342 words) - 11:48, 26 March 2021

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)