Difference between revisions of "EFET CMA versus RECS Agreement"

From Open Risk Manual
Line 25: Line 25:
 
| EECS GO, EECS-Disclosure Certificate, RECS Certificate, National Scheme Certificate
 
| EECS GO, EECS-Disclosure Certificate, RECS Certificate, National Scheme Certificate
 
| EECS GO, EECS-Disclosure Certificate
 
| EECS GO, EECS-Disclosure Certificate
 +
|-
 +
| Energy Source
 +
| Electricity, Gas, Fuel, Heating, Cooling
 +
| Electricity
 +
|-
 +
| Production Period Granularity
 +
| TBD
 +
| TBD
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Pre-Existing Contracts
 
| Pre-Existing Contracts
Line 31: Line 39:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Counterparty Risk
 
| Counterparty Risk
| Credit Support Document
+
| Credit Support Document, Provision of Financial Statements, Tangible Net Worth
 
| N/A
 
| N/A
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 17:29, 2 June 2023

EFET CMA versus RECS Agreement

A high level comparison of two examples of Energy Attribute Certificate trading contracts. Based on

  • EECS GO Trade Agreement For Single or Multiple Deliveries version 2.2
  • EFET EECS Certificates Master Agreement Version 1.1(b)


NB: The focus of the comparison is on concepts and data requirements relating in particular to the function of such instruments as Guarantee of Origin rather than legal and more generic financial contract details.

Concept / Data Attribute EFET RCES
Objective Purchase, Sale, Delivery and Acceptance of Certificates Sell and Deliver / Buy and Accept a Quantity of Certificates.
Number of Certificates Master Agreement Agreement For Single or Multiple Deliveries
Certificate Types EECS GO, EECS-Disclosure Certificate, RECS Certificate, National Scheme Certificate EECS GO, EECS-Disclosure Certificate
Energy Source Electricity, Gas, Fuel, Heating, Cooling Electricity
Production Period Granularity TBD TBD
Pre-Existing Contracts Recognized as Individual Contracts N/A
Counterparty Risk Credit Support Document, Provision of Financial Statements, Tangible Net Worth N/A